Author Archive

NANO Institute 2011

Friday, July 8th, 2011

posted by: mcrocker

This year’s NANO Institute should be a great opportunity for more local teachers, students, and schools to increase their exposure to the world of the nanoscale through the works of NDeRC’s NANO Collaboration.  While the makeup of the NANO Collaboration is changing, for the summer, we will be in full force!  The institute will be better than ever.   As for the possible school year NANOweeks,  the experiences from the past year as well as the in-roads we made with other teachers and schools should allow for the continued success of NANO for the future.  NANO is the new BioEyes!

1 person likes this post.

NANO Classroom Visits

Saturday, November 6th, 2010

posted by: mcrocker

Over the past few weeks, the three graduate fellows in the NANO collaboration (myself included) have visited 3 different classrooms, providing exciting nano-related instruction to 9 different classes for hundreds of middle and high school students.  It has been an interesting experience, and we have continued to modify our activities and rearrange our presentations based on what has worked well in past classes.  There was a significant different between high school and middle school attention spans.  However, each class had a unique personality, and the makeup of the classroom has been a fun mishmash of student personalities.  In one classroom, it was the quiet, studious student that showed the most interest.  In another, it was the loud, raucous student that showed the most interest, and gave a final positive exclamation at the end of the class in support of our visit.  While there were some students who complained about how our activities and presentations were a waste of time, most of the students were eager to measure ping-pong balls … ahem … atoms.  While some students were just glad have a change of pace, many students did show enthusiasm for our visit, for discussions of college/graduate school, for live demonstrations of unusual microscopes, and for discussions of the implications and diversity of career paths connected to nanotechnology.  I am excited to do this again, and we will have ample opportunity over the next half year!

Be the first to like.

NANO Institute #3

Friday, August 20th, 2010

posted by: mcrocker

A few weeks ago now, the NANO collaboration finished its second NANO Summer Institute.  As I blogged before, it was a big success.  While the pictures below are from the second week, I want to use these pictures to illustrate three of the many activities that we tested out at the institutes and will definitely use in our classroom visits during the upcoming school year.  These activities are simple to put together, but are very good for introducing the more complex activities that we have planned for afterward (like Atomic Force Microscope and Scanning Tunneling Microscope analog activities and data analysis activities).

The first activity involves building a basic telescope from tubes and lenses.  The telescope that the teachers made, and the students will make, is nothing special.  It is a rather poor telescope by modern standards.  However, the activity is a tangible way to start thinking about microscopy and imaging.  Simple parts are put together to make a tool that can be used to study extraordinary things (far off objects like buildings, trees, mountains, clouds, moon, planets, stars, etc.).

Once created, the teachers use the telescopes to look at the world around them.  One interesting effect of the telescope is that it inverts the image seen by the viewer’s eye.  Things moving up look like they are moving down, and things moving to the right look like they are moving to the left.  This is just one of many “artifacts” that imaging tools create.  An artifact in this sense is “any error in the perception or representation of any visual information introduced by the involved equipment or techniques.”  Any scientist who uses tools and scientific/mathematical techniques to improve their work must learn to identify correct data and data that is caused by the equipment, etc.  Exploring the unknown leads to situations where unknown things must be identified in one way or another.  In some cases, the unknown thing might actually be a “fake” object that is just “noise” or some other effect.

The best part was that we had the chance to look like pirates!  Arghhh!

Another simple activity is just to look at many, many, many common objects under a microscope.  We had digital microscopes for each teacher, and we all looked at grass, bugs, rulers, coins, paper, computer chips, flowers, seeds, ink, mouse pads, etc. … you get the idea.  We looked at anything that we thought of and could get our hands on.  This sort of exploring is what scientists doing cutting-edge research do.  It is a lot of fun, and helps those participating in the activity get the sense of wonder that exploration brings.  It also conveys the idea that science is not just a base of knowledge put forward by the “scientific community,” it is also exploration of the unknown, which really just means satisfying natural human curiosity.

The teachers liked this activity so much, we just had them run with it for almost an extra hour.  We sent Becky outside to find more things to look at, like bugs!  We even had the teachers turn the microscope head around so that they could see how the computer translates the image, and that orientation is an arbitrary concept to the computer tool, and in some cases, arbitrary for the scientist too.

The last simple activity that I want to talk about has to do with awe and real demonstration.  When a person sees a cool object that, up to that point, seemed mysterious they get excited and are more willing to imagine themselves interacting with that object.  They are more engaged, they ask more questions, and they want to get involved.  (It is interesting how many things I use as an engineer that are now ordinary to me, but would draw interest from someone else for hours!)  We took the teachers on a tour of campus labs.

At the new engineering building, we showed them the clean room and all the support equipment, like these tubes and control systems:

Becky showed them her Scanning Tunneling Microscope (STM), which is at high vacuum and requires cooling with liquid nitrogen:

She also bragged about the “homemade” STM in her lab:

While we cannot take all the students on tours like this, we do have portable scopes (Scanning Electron Microscope, Atomic Force Microscope, and Scanning Tunneling Microscope) that we can take with us.  When we do scans of real objects and surfaces (no matter how boring we think they are), those who have even the smallest interest become deeply engaged, since they want to know how it works, and often cannot believe how small these devices can actually be.  (Even looking at that huge metal cage above that Becky is showing off, it is interesting to note that the actual STM device is actually on a tiny part of the whole.  The rest is just an isolation structure for vibrations and temperature.)

Be the first to like.

NANO Institute #2

Friday, August 6th, 2010

posted by: mcrocker

The second Nano Institute was a big success.  We took the feedback from the first one, and made it even better.  Changes included: making the activities and scale games more involved and longer lasting, reducing the highly technical content a bit, showing more videos to help illustrate certain concepts, and talking about nano applications more often and in more depth.  We also got lucky because all three scopes (SEM, AFM, & STM) worked the second time around.  The one downside was that the teachers did not have a chance to see as much when we took the lab tour.  During the first week, the teachers got to see the new SEM in operation because students were working on it, and they got to see both Becky’s lab and Val’s lab.  During the second week, the SEM was inactive when we visited and Val’s lab was not on the tour since equipment was being moved around.

I think overall we kept the teachers more engaged, already having one week under our belt.  As for the results of these two institutes, I think this upcoming year will be very successful at all grade levels.  The middle school and high school classes will experience us differently than the youngest classes, both in how much we present but also because the elementary teachers seem to have more flexibility in setting up a “nano week” type of thing.  In any case, our experience over the summer with these institutes will help a lot when presenting to the students.

Scale games and getting students to think about relative sizes when it comes to micro and nano will be valuable for all ages (though the difficulty and specific objects used in the games will have to be different).  Presentation and demonstration of the scopes will have to be organized quite differently for different ages.  For the youngest students, the concept of microscopes might be enough to keep them busy.  For the older students, we can do more and talk about how “seeing without light” works using more scientific terms and ideas.  It should be a lot of fun.

Be the first to like.

NANO Institute #1

Saturday, July 24th, 2010

posted by: mcrocker

The 1st NANO Institute (for middle school and high school teachers) was a big success!  The teachers put in the effort and showed a lot of enthusiasm.  The three NANO fellows (Me, Becky, and Val), along with Pat and Lynda, provided what seemed to be effective explanations about nanotechnology and good illustrations and demonstrations of various microscopy techniques.  The lab tours were especially useful to the teachers to give them a view of what nano-reserach — and scientific research in general — is about.  There were times that what we presented to the teachers was simplistic, and, other times, what we presented was quite dense.  However, I think the combined effect was perfect.  The teachers learned that it is possible to explain the nano concepts in simple ways, but that there is also incredible depth to the nano topics for those who are interested.  Check out the NANO Institute Wiki for more details.

Based on discussions with the teachers, we came up with some really good ideas.  I do not know if all of this can be achieved, but it does provide some good goals to aim for.

1.  Make videos showing graduate researchers introducing some science topics that the younger students will be learning about, and then discuss and show how that scientific knowledge is vital to the grad’s research.  These videos can be used by teachers to increase student engagement and interest in scientific learning, class work, and lab work.   (For example, make a video about how elements can be detected in an unknown sample using X-Ray Fluorescence, and then have the teachers link it back to learning about radiation, wavelength, electron energy levels, etc.)

2.  When we talked about using Excel or other software to plot data, and compared that to microscope imaging, I thought it might be good to think about ways to get the students involved in presenting their data to the whole class at the end of a project or lab.  We could incorporate this into our NANO classroom activities.

3.  Intentionally give the students an activity which requires them to try to identify something, but limit their senses (no sight, for example) AND make the conclusion ambiguous.  It might be frustrating for some or all of the students, but that should be a sign of success!  Often, when “looking” at nano-objects, there is no error-free way to determine what is being viewed without further investigations (using other microscopes or using other techniques).  In a sense, collecting data from only one tool is often very ambiguous.

Be the first to like.